There seems a chain of events to avoid problems with Ed Helms, who has decided to digitally alter the face of the actor and thus avoid violating the copyright of Victor Whitmill, the tattoo artist in question, of course that will take place in the home version of Hangover 2.
This issue has led me to think about copyright in the tattoo world - body modification, as any work that exposes an artist; it has rights to it, of course yes, because a tattoo does not cease to be a design that leads at least symbolically, the signature of its creator.
For example, the tattooist may translate into the skin of his client a design that is its authorship, or a picture or design that was originally made by this artist to be tattooed, in such cases there will be no problem. The problem occurs when the tattoo in question belongs to another artist, because in this situation one should seek permission to reproduce the drawing on the skin of someone.
Other trim posed by copyright law, but so far only say that if the tattoos are copyrighted.
Often we are surprised with the news that we find on the net, but the latter involving the tattoo world spread like wildfire and there were few media that took the detail to verify the accuracy of the same. We tell the truth about the woman who pretended to tattoo his 152 Facebook friends in her arms.
As commented in the network, a girl in Amsterdam posted a video on YouTube which showed the time she came to study the tattoo artist Xaviera Moelker and tattooed the faces of friends who have 152 in the social network Facebook, she said in that film that had been around thirty hours they had taken the artist to make this picture.
Soon the tape became popular and was seen by millions, and even in numerous publications including newspaper and note the color of the day, however, Moelker recently declared that everything was a farce like body plugs, since it is actually a tattoo to be in a few days, apply it only took a few hours and apparently it was just a publicity stunt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment